Canadian Institute For Knowledge Development
  • Register
  • Login

Marketing and Branding Research

Notice

As part of Open Journals’ initiatives, we create website for scholarly open access journals. If you are responsible for this journal and would like to know more about how to use the editorial system, please visit our website at https://ejournalplus.com or
send us an email to info@ejournalplus.com

We will contact you soon

  1. Home
  2. Volume 7, Issue 1
  3. Authors

Current Issue

By Issue

By Subject

Keyword Index

Author Index

Indexing Databases XML

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

News

An Empirical Evaluation of Requirements Prioritization Techniques

    Naila Jan Irum Inayat Muhammad Abbas

Marketing and Branding Research, 2020, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 11-23
10.33844/mbr.2020.60322

  • Show Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

In today’s time and budget intensive software development market, quick delivery is the basic
motive of teams. Software development teams strive to gain customer satisfaction by all
possible means. Requirements prioritization is the most challenging customer input dependent
task in the software development life cycle that decides the fate of a project. Selection of a
well-suited requirements prioritization technique may result in customer satisfaction and on
time delivery time. Literature reports on many requirements prioritization techniques in
practice. However, each has its own features that can outperform the rest for a certain case.
Therefore, this research is conducted to empirically evaluate the existing techniques in terms
of certain quality measures (i.e., accuracy, efficiency, and scalability). The selected techniques
are evaluated for the small, medium and large scale of requirements sets. For that, we selected
five existing techniques that are multi-criteria-decision-making techniques and have user
involvement (i.e., Analytical Hieratical Process (AHP), Analytical Network Process (ANP),
FuzzyAHP, FuzzyANP and Interactive Genetic Algorithm (IGA)). The experimental results
showed that among the five selected techniques, FuzzyAHP is the most efficient and accurate
technique for the large dataset of requirements.







Keywords:
    Requirements Prioritization Prioritization Techniques AIbased Prioritization Techniques Manual Prioritization Techniques Empirical Evaluation
  • PDF (533 K)
  • XML
(2020). An Empirical Evaluation of Requirements Prioritization Techniques. Marketing and Branding Research, 7(1), 11-23. doi: 10.33844/mbr.2020.60322
Naila Jan; Irum Inayat; Muhammad Abbas. "An Empirical Evaluation of Requirements Prioritization Techniques". Marketing and Branding Research, 7, 1, 2020, 11-23. doi: 10.33844/mbr.2020.60322
(2020). 'An Empirical Evaluation of Requirements Prioritization Techniques', Marketing and Branding Research, 7(1), pp. 11-23. doi: 10.33844/mbr.2020.60322
An Empirical Evaluation of Requirements Prioritization Techniques. Marketing and Branding Research, 2020; 7(1): 11-23. doi: 10.33844/mbr.2020.60322
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • Vancouver
  • Article View: 76
  • PDF Download: 116
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Telegram
  • Home
  • Glossary
  • News
  • Aims and Scope
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0)

Powered by eJournalPlus